
- #The cocomo model drivers
- #The cocomo model driver
- #The cocomo model code
Counting the values for LOC at the beginning of the project is difficult but at the end it is simple. #The cocomo model code
In this the lines for commenting the code and header lines are ignored.
LOC is the simplest and most popular method to measure the size of the project by couting the total number of source instruction in the developed program. #The cocomo model drivers
In detailed COCOMO, the effort is calculated as function of program size and a set of cost drivers given according to each phase of software life cycle.Ī Detailed project schedule is never static. These Phase Sensitive effort multipliers are each to determine the amount of effort required to complete each phase.
#The cocomo model driver
The detailed model uses different effort multipliers for each cost driver attribute.
Application of software engineering methodsĭetailed COCOMO incorporates all characteristics of the intermediate version with an assessment of the cost driver’s impact on each step (analysis, design, etc.) of the software engineering process. Volatility of the virtual machine environment. This extension considers a set of four “cost drivers”, each with a number of subsidiary attributes:. Intermediate COCOMO computes software development effort as function of program size and a set of “cost drivers” that include subjective assessment of product, hardware, personnel and project attributes. The coefficients a b, b b, c b and d b are given in the following table: Software projectīasic COCOMO is good for quick estimate of software costs. Where, KLOC is the estimated number of delivered lines (expressed in thousands ) of code for project.
People required (P) = Effort Applied / Development Time It is also combination of organic and semi-detached projects.(hardware, software, operational)Įffort Applied (E) = a b(KLOC) b b ĭevelopment Time (D) = c b(Effort Applied) d b Embedded projects – developed within a set of “tight” constraints.Semi-detached projects – “medium” teams with mixed experience working with a mix of rigid and less than rigid requirements.Organic projects – “small” teams with “good” experience working with “less than rigid” requirements.Program size is expressed in estimated thousands of source lines of code (SLOC)ĬOCOMO applies to three classes of software projects: Most of the other COCOMO results, including the estimates for Requirements and Maintenance, are derived from this quantity.īasic COCOMO computes software development effort (and cost) as a function of program size. It limits the accuracy of the software costs.The most fundamental calculation in the COCOMO model is the use of the Effort Equation to estimate the number of Person-Months required to develop a project.It ignores requirements, customer skills, and hardware issues.Provide ideas about historical projects.
Easy to implement with various factors. Easy to estimate the total cost of the project. Schedule and experience of development time.Īdvantages and Disadvantages of COCOMO Modelįollowing are some advantages and disadvantages of the COCOMO model. Solution: The semidetached mode is the most appropriate, keeping in view the size, Calculate the Effort, development time, average staff size, and productivity of the project. The software development team has average experience on similar types of projects. Post-architecture model is used once the system architecture has been designed and more information about the system.Įxample: A project size of 200 KLOC is to be developed. Reuse model used to compute the effort of integrating reusable components. Early design model used when requirements are available but the design has not yet started. Application composition model used when software is composed of existing parts. COCOMO 2 incorporates a range of sub-models that produce increasingly detailed software estimates. COCOMO 2 takes into account different approaches to software development, reuse, etc. A long history from the initial version published in 1981 (COCOMO-81) through various instantiations to COCOMO 2. It is a well-documented, 'independent' model which is not tied to a specific software vendor. COCOMO (Constructive Cost Modeling) cost modeling is an empirical model based on project experience.